Geek News and Musings

OpenDNS Protects Against the Conficker Worm [OpenDNS]

Yesterday we offered up a guide to protecting your Windows PC from the Conficker worm, set to start doing … something today. Free net service OpenDNS is another option for anyone concerned about today’s not-so-funny happening.

Why? OpenDNS has been tracking the Conficker worm and blocking the sites it keeps reaching out to for its nefarious further instructions. As OpenDNS’ David Ulevitch puts it:

The latest variant of Conficker is now churning through 50,000 domains per day in an attempt to thwart blocking attempts. Consider this: at any given time we have filters that hold well over 1,000,000 domains (when you combine our phishing and domain tagging filters). 50,000 domains a day isn’t going to rock the boat.

In other words, even if Conficker has made it onto your PC, or a PC somewhere in your house/office, OpenDNS will likely stop the worm from contacting the site that would tell it what to do.

If you’re still using your Road Runner/Comcast/Verizon DNS pre-sets on your home router, consider that OpenDNS can also speed up your surfing by allowing keyboard shortcuts from any system, work as a parental filter, and prevent you from seeing so many of those “no such site, but here’s a whole bunch of ads!” parking pages. It’s free to use and set up; here’s a detailed guide for home networks.

Networks In Motion To Launch First GPS App For BlackBerry App World

In news that seems to indicate that Blackberry’s App World is indeed launching tomorrow, we’ve learned that Networks In Motion (NIM) will be releasing a GPS application for the BlackBerry on Wednesday, which would make it the first (or at least, tied for first) GPS app available on the new storefront.

NIM has built a number of applications and services for its partners, including Verizon Navigator, but this is the first time it has sold an application carrying its label to end-users. The new GPS application takes advantage of technology built by TrafficGuage, which NIM acquired earlier this month. TrafficGuage’s technology will be used to offer users real-time traffic updates on the application. Other features in the app include the ability to locate nearby points of interest (like gas stations) and multiple viewing angles. NIM has not yet released exact pricing, but the application will be available on a subscription basis.

Depending on the application’s pricing and how well it works, NIM’s app could do very well on the BlackBerry application storefront. And while BlackBerry will have GPS for its app store’s launch, it’s worth noting that Apple’s App Store appears to have actually banned turn-by-turn GPS applications (even if developers can get them working) until the iPhone’s 3.0 software is released this summer.

Crunch Network: CrunchBoard because it’s time for you to find a new Job2.0

Verizon, Too, Turns To Subsidized Netbooks
We’ve wondered before why mobile operators say they hate the subsidies they pay to discount handset prices, but then expand their use of them to include laptops and netbooks. The trend looks like it’s here to stay, as Verizon Wireless has now confirmed it will start selling 3G-equipped netbooks by the end of June, so now, in addition to tying yourself into a 2-year contract where you’re paying back the cost of your cell phone, you’ll soon be able to tie yourself into a long-term data-service contract to pay back the price of a laptop, too. Of course, once that contract’s up, the device will still be locked to the operator from which you bought it, making it difficult (or impossible) to take your business elsewhere. Meanwhile, business is flowing the other direction, too: Dell is reportedly looking to set up a virtual operator in Japan, selling its customers network access on another operator’s mobile network to use with their mobile-equipped laptops. It’s an interesting contrast in models, because it’s unlikely Dell will subsidize the hardware like the operators. Part of the issue with handset subsidies is that consumers are used to paying the lower subsidized prices, and so any change that raises prices will be met with disdain. But people aren’t used to the benefit of subsidies for their PCs, so may be more open to paying a higher upfront cost for the hardware if it means they don’t have to sign a long-term contract with a high monthly service charge.

Carlo Longino is an expert at the Insight Community. To get insight and analysis from Carlo Longino and other experts on challenges your company faces, click here.

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

AT&T And Comcast’s Non-Denial Denial Of Three Strikes
Yesterday some stories broke about how AT&T and Comcast were “testing” the RIAA’s “three strikes” plan. As we noted, this wasn’t a surprise at all, as both companies had indicated willingness to do so — but it was amusing to see both companies avoid fully admitting it. In fact, both companies have now come out denying that they’re doing any such thing, but you have to read between the lines here, and it’s not at all difficult to see what’s almost certainly happening.

Both companies are "testing" a program by which they send infringement notices on to the users. That's the part that both have admitted they're doing, but they get to deny any three strikes plan, because no one's getting cut off. But, that's only because people haven't been accused multiple times yet. Thus, this way they get to start heading down that path without ever making an official statement that they support the RIAA's plan to kick people off. It's a way to ease into such a program (they hope) without the PR headaches that would come with such a plan. But, note that neither AT&T nor Comcast will take a stand like Verizon has, where it flat out said that it will not give in to the RIAA (and, in Verizon’s case, the company does have a decent history fighting against the RIAA when it comes to protecting its customers’ privacy).

If AT&T and Comcast really want people to believe that they're not going down this path, then why won't they come out and say the same things that Verizon is saying?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

AT&T And Comcast’s Non-Denial Denial Of Three Strikes
Yesterday some stories broke about how AT&T and Comcast were “testing” the RIAA’s “three strikes” plan. As we noted, this wasn’t a surprise at all, as both companies had indicated willingness to do so — but it was amusing to see both companies avoid fully admitting it. In fact, both companies have now come out denying that they’re doing any such thing, but you have to read between the lines here, and it’s not at all difficult to see what’s almost certainly happening.

Both companies are "testing" a program by which they send infringement notices on to the users. That's the part that both have admitted they're doing, but they get to deny any three strikes plan, because no one's getting cut off. But, that's only because people haven't been accused multiple times yet. Thus, this way they get to start heading down that path without ever making an official statement that they support the RIAA's plan to kick people off. It's a way to ease into such a program (they hope) without the PR headaches that would come with such a plan. But, note that neither AT&T nor Comcast will take a stand like Verizon has, where it flat out said that it will not give in to the RIAA (and, in Verizon’s case, the company does have a decent history fighting against the RIAA when it comes to protecting its customers’ privacy).

If AT&T and Comcast really want people to believe that they're not going down this path, then why won't they come out and say the same things that Verizon is saying?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

AT&T And Comcast’s Non-Denial Denial Of Three Strikes
Yesterday some stories broke about how AT&T and Comcast were “testing” the RIAA’s “three strikes” plan. As we noted, this wasn’t a surprise at all, as both companies had indicated willingness to do so — but it was amusing to see both companies avoid fully admitting it. In fact, both companies have now come out denying that they’re doing any such thing, but you have to read between the lines here, and it’s not at all difficult to see what’s almost certainly happening.

Both companies are "testing" a program by which they send infringement notices on to the users. That's the part that both have admitted they're doing, but they get to deny any three strikes plan, because no one's getting cut off. But, that's only because people haven't been accused multiple times yet. Thus, this way they get to start heading down that path without ever making an official statement that they support the RIAA's plan to kick people off. It's a way to ease into such a program (they hope) without the PR headaches that would come with such a plan. But, note that neither AT&T nor Comcast will take a stand like Verizon has, where it flat out said that it will not give in to the RIAA (and, in Verizon’s case, the company does have a decent history fighting against the RIAA when it comes to protecting its customers’ privacy).

If AT&T and Comcast really want people to believe that they're not going down this path, then why won't they come out and say the same things that Verizon is saying?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story